Compliant Speech Data
for Enterprise AI
Lawfully sourced and fully consented speech datasets designed for enterprise AI systems operating under the EU General Data Protection Regulation.
This page addresses GDPR compliance for speech data sourcing and lifecycle governance. EU AI Act obligations for high-risk systems are addressed separately.
Not a data marketplace. No scraping. No anonymous contributors.
The Rising Regulatory Exposure for
AI Training Data
For enterprise organizations, data provenance is no longer a "nice to have"βit is a go/no-go criterion for model deployment.
The era of indiscriminate data scraping is ending. European regulators are now actively scrutinizing the lawful basis of acquisition for training datasets under GDPR Article 6.
Legal Risk Doctrine
"Using non-compliant speech data creates a toxic asset. Under the 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine, a model trained on illicit data may face mandatory deletion orders."
Speech Data Risk Assessment
Inherent Personal Data
Voice is a biological identifier. Even without metadata, speech content and acoustic markers can re-identify individuals.
Biometric Category
Voice data can constitute biometric data under GDPR Article 9 when processed for identification or verification purposes. This triggers "Special Category" status. The legal bar jumps from "Legitimate Interest" to "Explicit Consent."
Retraining Liability
Liability persists across model versions. If the original dataset provenance cannot be verified years later, the model itself is compromised.
What YPAI Provides to
GDPR-Constrained Enterprises
YPAI is not a generic data marketplace. We provide production-grade speech datasets specifically engineered for enterprises that cannot tolerate regulatory ambiguity.
Core Deliverables
Off-the-Shelf Speech Datasets
Ready-to-deploy libraries of EU-sourced speech data for immediate training, evaluation, and fine-tuning. Delivered as structured, annotated audio corpora with full demographic metadata.
Custom Scoped Collection
Rapid execution of specific demographic, acoustic, or linguistic requirements. Data is collected within our controlled platformβnever scraped, never crowdsourced from open markets.
Included Compliance Artifacts
Audit Documentation Package
Every dataset delivery includes comprehensive lineage records: consent IDs, verified collection timestamps, and geographic origin logs for legal defense.
Enterprise Engagement Models
Commercial frameworks designed for procurement: Master Services Agreements (MSA), Data Processing Agreements (DPA), and explicit Indemnification clauses.
These controls apply to all speech datasets delivered by YPAI.
Lawful Basis & Participant Consent
To deliver enterprise speech datasets that can be lawfully used in production AI systems, YPAI structures all data collection under defined GDPR Article 6 lawful bases.
We rely primarily on Consent (Article 6(1)(a)). Unlike scraped data where the legal basis is often murky "Legitimate Interest", YPAI's controlled collection ensures every second of speech in our delivered datasets is backed by an affirmative action from the data subject.
"Consent must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous indication of the data subject's wishes."
The Consent Workflow for Delivered Data
Detailed consent framework documentation, including exact copies of participant agreements used for your specific dataset, is available for legal review during the evaluation phase.
Data Subject Rights & Operational Handling
Right of Access (DSAR)
We maintain indexed metadata for all contributors. Upon receipt of an authenticated Subject Access Request (SAR), we can query our repository to locate specific recordings associated with a User ID within any delivered dataset.
Right to Erasure (RTBF)
When a valid deletion request is processed, data is purged from our active storage buckets. "Do Not Use" flags are propagated to client deliverables where contractually enforceable. Where deletion is not technically reversible in trained models, YPAI documents withdrawal and enforces non-use in future training and deliveries, consistent with prevailing regulatory guidance. We maintain deletion logs to prove compliance during audits.
Note: This framework governs how YPAI delivers speech data into production AI environments, ensuring long-term defensibility.
Provenance & Audit Defensibility
Defending Your Training Data
The difference between "having data" and "defending data" lies in provenance. YPAI speech datasets are not aggregations of unknown files; they are constructed assets with complete lineage.
Granular Asset Lineage
Every audio file delivered is linked to a specific collection event, a verified contributor profile, and a timestamped consent record.
Long-Term Auditability
Our metadata structure allows clients to answer audit questions years after deployment: "Where did this specific training vector come from, and did we have the right to use it?"
{
"file_id": "ypai_v4_29841",
"origin": "EU_FR_PARIS",
"consent_id": "c_9928_v2_signed",
"lawful_basis": "GDPR_ART_6_1_A",
"demographics": {
"yob": 1992,
"gender": "female"
},
"collection_date": "2024-02-14T10:00:00Z"
}
Data Residency & Sovereignty
By default, YPAI processes and stores data within the EEA (European Economic Area) for European engagements.
- Cloud Regions: Frankfurt, Dublin (AWS/GCP)
- Transfers governed by SCCs where applicable
Controller vs. Processor
Roles are explicitly defined in the Master Services Agreement (MSA). We adapt our role based on the engagement structure:
Security & Retention
We implement rigorous Technical and Organizational Measures (TOMs) including AES-256 encryption at rest and strict RBAC.
- Automated retention & deletion policies
- Data not retained beyond defined purpose
Explicit Statement on Crowdsourcing
YPAI differentiates itself through a closed-loop collection service. We are not a crowdsourcing marketplace. We do not use unvetted public crowd workers. We do not scrape data from the web.
Crowdsourcing Fails Compliance
- β’ Impossible to verify true speaker identity (Sybil attacks)
- β’ High risk of "farmed" or synthetic data injection
- β’ Weak consent enforceability across jurisdictions
Closed-Loop Collection
- β’ Contracted contributors with verified IDs
- β’ Device-fingerprinting and environment checks
- β’ Direct legal relationship with data subjects
Data Processing & Audit
DPA & Governance
We operate under formal DPAs aligned with GDPR Art 28. Sub-processors are fully disclosed. YPAI acts as Data Processor or Independent Controller depending on engagement.
Audit Readiness
Full audit documentation is available for legal and compliance review. Provenance is verifiable for long-term production use.
Engagement Model
Technical & compliance scoping
Pilot / Evaluation dataset
Production delivery with SLA
Further Details for Legal & Procurement
Request Consultation
Start a scoped, confidential discussion with our data team.
Thank you! Our team will be in touch within 24 hours.
Something went wrong. Please try again or email us directly.